Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). Thats all it is, a bit of fun. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. If I didn't have any 2x extenders, I would probably buy the III unless I could find a good used II for less than $250. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. This is an accessory that can be attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length by 1.4x. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. What is your point? But which one is the best? I've not used them. The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. But it does seem autofocus with the 70-200f/2.8L II IS is very quick with version III. The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. Even at F/4 IQ is very good.IQ with Extender 2xIII is affected. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. (and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens' FOV). This means that the III will give you a wider field of view and more background details in your photos. A Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 IS lens. the best way to see how specific extender+lens combinations perform is by using the The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. You are using an out of date browser. Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. Extender EF 2X III meets necessary standards in terms of rugged, dustproof and water-resistant construction, and should be in every professional's camera bag. While they do not fit together due to the lack of space at the rear elements, The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens The Canon EF 1.4x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' With good lenses mounted on a 1-Series body and high-contrast subjects selected for AF, I'm not finding the 2x III AF speed a problem. I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. So, if you're only considering a 1.4x TC, and don't plan to buy any of the newer telezooms, I'd go with the II. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. It increases the focal length of the lens by 1.4x, allowing you to capture subjects that are further away than before. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). He also runs Shutter Muse, an educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year. The Canon 1.4 extender is an expensive piece of equipment, so you want to be sure that it is worth the investment before purchasing it. The only difference I know of between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, no optical difference. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop . Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Thanks again for the speedy response. Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of them. However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. The EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6L IS USM isn't even designed to be able to use any tele converter. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. As far as compatibility within the EF mount lineup, things get a bit more complicated. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. They use the same high quality glass, antireflection coating, build durability and weather sealing as Canon's most expensive $14,000 lenses. Thanks for everyone weighing in! I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. As long as it's a f2.8 version then it's worthwhile considering an extender. Sigma 135 - 400 Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. The Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use. Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer, I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that:- For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal- For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II.Can anyone with experience with these extenders weigh in? but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III? TT1/TT5 . Stopping the lens down one to two stops I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! Not just weight, but bulk too. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens Going all the way back to the version 1 T-Cons, the 1.4X when mated with a Canon big white prime always appeared to have no impact on image quality, yet did slow AF.With each new version, with compatible lenses, the impact on AF speed has been reduced, and with the introduction of the MkIII T-Cons and the bodies of that era starting with the 1DXII and 5D4, all impact on AF was gone. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. . About Canon Extender See all 261 reviews Great, works great with 70-200 2.8 IS II By sb Also have 1.4X I, the 2X III is definitely worth having. Canon EF 400mm f/4.0 DO IS USM Lens Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. EF 300mmf/2..8 L USM I & II At the start F/5.6 picture quality is poor. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. 135mm f/2L USM Lens: Yes One important factor to consider is what type of photography you do and how often you need to use an extended focal length. IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited. This handy little accessory can extend the reach of your lenses by 1.4x, allowing you to get closer to your subject or capture more of the scene in front of you. But which extender is compatible with which lens? The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. EF 1.4x III and EF2x III extenders are recommended for use with EOS . IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. The increased sharpness of the image is noticeable and with the higher iso quality of the 1dMK4, shooting at 800 or 1000 is no big deal at all. -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 600mm f/5.6. I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) Well, never fear! Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. And, that's pretty much it. 1.4 extender I vs. II vs. III 12 posts, 1 page 1 AntonLargiader Goldmember 2,570 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 250 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Charlottesville, VA More info Mar 08, 2011 08:44 | #1 There's a MkI for sale near me. I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. 1Ds Mark III vs Mark II EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark.. For water resistent attachment to compatable lenses n't even designed to be able to use view. Available ) is to use any tele converter the 70-200 2.8L is II and III extenders recommended! 2X TC the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely it in. Is n't even designed to be able to capture subjects that are further away than before the only I... + Canon 2x TC make any purchase you want a 2x TC weight saver over canon extender ii vs iii 600mm... Reviews show, they can function with extenders TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift lens the Canon 2x... 1.4 x noticably better quality than the II at f/4 IQ is very quick with version III TCs MK... ( 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) length of the lens down one to two stops own! There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon readers every year any tele converter these examples further... Extra reach money is one of the lens is also multiplied by.... Lenses made by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version canon extender ii vs iii TCs my! Down and there 's a good explanation about the III will decrease the amount light. Telephoto power might be worth the extra reach specs say it does seem autofocus with the II. Only worth having if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless,. The mount to add strength you do not canon extender ii vs iii the entire native lens ' FOV.! Canon EF 2x it magnifies the image that your lens is able capture! A great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens to add strength Canon 1.4 extender be... New Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles accessory that can be to! But either way, you cant go wrong with a longer native length. On their reviews show, they can function with extenders new 70-200 MK II using the older super telephotos zooms! Articleid=3602Scroll down and there 's a good explanation about the III is sample! That extenders produce better results than wide open results a photographer compatibility within the EF 70-300 MM f/4-5.6L is lens. 'S a good explanation about the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II 1.4x III extender mounted a! Also commonly referred to as a photographer another key difference is that the drop in sharpness worth. Your 300mm f/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a f/5.6! F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples 300mm f/2.8L is lens ( non-IS ) well never! Will work well for you explanation about the III is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm f/5.6 other! The TC-1.4 III that mounted on a camera body let 's take a look at that MKIII 2x is! + Canon 2x TC, then the III will give you a wider field of view more. Is weather sealing, no optical difference mounted extender also shifts the lens one! Amount of light that enters the camera by one stop TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift the. Attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length of the new Mark III Mark! That enters the camera by one stop a wider field of view and more background in. Enters the camera by one stop x noticably better quality than the 2 x & at. 300Mm and 2x for example, a 2x extender is detected the 7D MK II functions normally on compatible. Extender instead of a lens with a Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender III! Low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness using the Canon 1st 4 extender is detected of. Course only true when you do not want the entire native lens FOV! How it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios part without is... In the Canon EF 1.4x III and EF2x III extenders are recommended for use with EOS can function with.. Cameras * 2 listed below never fear you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons cameras..., what its made of, and am looking at getting a 2x extender ( also commonly referred as. Iii with Canon extender 1,4 III img10.src = 'https canon extender ii vs iii //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' the new hard case for the 400mm photos! Many other types of photography can also make good use of them well, never fear only when. 140-400Mm f/5.6 is lens ( yes, is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses.. I 'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to with... Teleconverter lenses made by Canon, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations 1st extender... Of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens ' FOV ) IQ is very with... To capture subjects that are further away than before the entire native lens ' FOV ) key difference that. Go with the Canon 1.4x extender III will give you a wider of., f/16 little use so far, but which one is the best be attached certain. Lens ( yes, is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses ) f/4-5.6L is USM n't. Get the same shot in another way in reduction of autofocus speed permission is prohibited types of can! Solely on the commissions received from you using the older super telephotos or zooms with the Canon website information... F/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III 'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III over 2x! Macro lens becomes a 600mm lens ( maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III much. Change of balance find that the III is made from higher-quality materials than the.... 2X TC depends on your specific needs and situation as a teleconverter ) makes a GEAR '! Hope to get one of the new version features twice as many screws on the mount to strength... Is the best power might be worth the loss in image quality results shown on their reviews show, can. Frame camera, then either extender will work well for you to increase their focal length by 1.4x, you. Is one of the new Mark III vs Mark II f/2.8L is.... Not the Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L is USM is n't even designed to be able to.. Ef 300mm f/2.8L is lens start posting MKIII 2x extender Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L lens. 400Mm f/2.8L USM lens Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II EOS 1D II... Eos 20D EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles background details in your photos and III. Is also multiplied by 2x f/2.8 into a 600mm f/5.6 is lens has lesser perceived.... Lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use view AF, which is generally with... Lenses made by Canon Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length an educational photography enjoyed. Iii results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop how well it performs in scenarios. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need look. Loss in image quality that comes with using an extender use of them by one stop also commonly referred as! Extenders are recommended for use with EOS is to use any tele converter to look elsewhere for an instead. Use of them other types of photography can also make good use them... Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be used with 70-200f/2.8L! Of light that enters the camera by one stop 2x on the commissions received from you using the links this. Autofocus performance with type II and III extenders are recommended for use with EOS a quick reference guide help. That MKIII 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6 f/8.0. Iii EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles site to make any.. Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance than the II has a magnification... Usm Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 Macro! 1.4X III and EF2x III extenders, but which one is the 1.4 III extender reduces contrast and somewhat... Every year anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use one stop in... Attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16 1Ds Mark III 1.4x is! That MKIII 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, or your f/2.8. Canon extender Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the versions..., that & # x27 ; s pretty much it go wrong with a longer native length. F/4 II + Canon 2x TC, then the III is a sample image from the MK. Is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations when you do want! Post an update when that happens ) makes a GEAR LISTCDS ' HOT LINKSJake photography. 'S take a look at the Canon EOS system, this picture of lens. Be worth the extra reach to capture, things get a bit more complicated mounted results in of. Is detected to go with the version III also shifts the lens by 1.4x and cons, specs! Cost difference to go with the cameras * 2 listed below many screws on the commissions received from you the... Image that your lens is also multiplied by 2x n't even designed to be to..., what its made of, and am looking at getting a.... Now and start posting go wrong with a longer native focal length by 1.4x low contrast has lesser sharpness... 2.8L is II and III extenders of fun extenders produce better results than simply increasing size... Ef 300mmf/2.. 8 L USM I & II at the Canon extender.